Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Stepfun-ai

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekStepfun-ai
ReleasedJan 2025Jan 2026

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.