Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

R1 vs DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 wins:

  • Has reasoning mode

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.70$0.27 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.41 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$135000.00 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is 73% cheaper overall.

R1 Providers

Vercel $0.55 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.70
Azure $1.49
Together $3.00

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.40
AtlasCloud $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 Wins
6
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.834.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.937.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
68.096.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
84.486.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
70.887.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
61.789.6
Aider
Real-world code editing
64.0--
AIME
Competition math
68.3--
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1
64,000
tokens
Max output: 16,000 tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 61% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s0.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.00s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekDeepseek
ReleasedJan 2025Dec 2025

R1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 with:

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper output pricing at $0.41/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to R1's score of 15.9.
R1 has a 64,000 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window.
R1 does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision.