Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

R1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

R1 wins:

  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedJan 2025Jul 2025

R1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.6, compared to R1's score of 15.9.
R1 has a 64,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
R1 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.