Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 4 Maverick

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 4 Maverick
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 4 Maverick
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMeta-llama
ReleasedSep 2025Apr 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Llama 4 Maverick's score of 15.6.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Llama 4 Maverick supports vision.