Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Mistral Medium 3.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMistral Medium 3.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMistral Medium 3.1
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMistral AI
ReleasedSep 2025Aug 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's score of 18.3.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision.