Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMistral AI
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2024

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.