Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Kimi K2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
Kimi K2.5
Speed
Kimi K2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusKimi K2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusKimi K2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMoonshotai
ReleasedSep 2025Jan 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Kimi K2.5's score of 25.8.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Kimi K2.5 supports vision.