Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekNvidia
ReleasedSep 2025Oct 2024

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.