Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.21$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.79$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.12N/A DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 51% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
6
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Wins
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.514.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.910.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
53.78.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.669.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
75.148.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
52.929.0
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
163,840
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 20% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s82.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.24s
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekNvidia
ReleasedSep 2025Oct 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.