Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.21$0.04 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.79$0.16 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.12$0.10 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is 80% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Providers

No provider data available

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
4
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Wins
2
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.513.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.97.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
53.762.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.673.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
75.155.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
52.970.1
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
163,840
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 20% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusNemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s137.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.53s
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusNemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusNemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekNvidia
ReleasedSep 2025Sep 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with:

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.