Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekOpenAI
ReleasedSep 2025Jan 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's score of 31.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.