Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Xiaomi

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2025Unknown

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's score of 31.9.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.