Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale's score of 37.9.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.