Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMistral NemoWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.02 Mistral Nemo
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$0.04 Mistral Nemo
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.20$0.01 Mistral Nemo
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 96% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

No provider data available

Mistral Nemo Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
3
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins
0
Mistral Nemo Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMistral NemoWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
29.425.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
96.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.326.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
87.18.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
89.6--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-36.1-
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 20% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMistral NemoWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2025Jul 2024

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.