Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Kimi K2 Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
Speed
Kimi K2 Thinking

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.27$0.40 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.41$1.75 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Cache Read (per 1M)$135000.00$200000.00 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is 59% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.40
AtlasCloud $0.40

Kimi K2 Thinking Providers

Chutes $0.40 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.47
Parasail $0.50
SiliconFlow $0.55
AtlasCloud $0.60

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
5
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins
1
Kimi K2 Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
34.140.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
37.934.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
96.794.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.384.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
87.183.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
89.685.3
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins 5 out of 6 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 38% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s82.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.64s
Kimi K2 Thinking responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeKimi K2 Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeKimi K2 Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMoonshotai
ReleasedDec 2025Nov 2025

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper output pricing at $0.41/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to Kimi K2 Thinking's score of 34.8.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision. Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision.