Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2MiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.38/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to DeepSeek V3.2's score of 34.6.
DeepSeek V3.2 has a 163,840 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.