Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Kimi K2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Context Window
Kimi K2.5
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2Kimi K2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2Kimi K2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMoonshotai
ReleasedDec 2025Jan 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.38/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 34.6, compared to Kimi K2.5's score of 25.8.
DeepSeek V3.2 has a 163,840 token context window, while Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 does not support vision. Kimi K2.5 supports vision.