Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Xiaomi

DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.2MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.2MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekXiaomi
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.38/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to DeepSeek V3.2's score of 34.6.
DeepSeek V3.2 has a 163,840 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.