Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Fireworks
Fireworks
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

FARE 20B vs GPT-5.1-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

FARE 20B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
FARE 20B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureFARE 20BGPT-5.1-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyFARE 20BGPT-5.1-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorFireworksOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownNov 2025

FARE 20B Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.1-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

FARE 20B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. FARE 20B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
FARE 20B has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
FARE 20B does not support vision. GPT-5.1-Codex supports vision.