Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.0 FlashQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.07 Qwen3 Coder Next
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.30 Qwen3 Coder Next
Cache Read (per 1M)$25000.00$35000.00 Gemini 2.0 Flash
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.0 Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder Next is 27% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Providers

Google AI Studio $0.10 (Cheapest)
Google $0.10 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder Next Providers

Chutes $0.07 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.15
Novita $0.20
Together $0.50

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.0 Flash Wins
3
Qwen3 Coder Next Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 FlashQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
18.528.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
13.622.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
21.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
77.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
62.373.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
33.4--
AIME
Competition math
33.0--
Qwen3 Coder Next significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.0 Flash
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 8,192 tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.0 FlashQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s124.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.81s
Qwen3 Coder Next responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 FlashQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedFeb 2025Feb 2026

Gemini 2.0 Flash Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Gemini 2.0 Flash's score of 13.6.
Gemini 2.0 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.