Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-OSS-120b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.04 GPT-OSS-120b
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.19 GPT-OSS-120b
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.03N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cache Write (per 1M)$0.08N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-OSS-120b is 91% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Providers

Vercel $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

GPT-OSS-120b Providers

Chutes $0.04 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.05
Novita $0.05
NCompass $0.05
Clarifai $0.09

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Gemini 2.5 Flash Wins
5
GPT-OSS-120b Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
21.133.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
17.828.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
60.393.4
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
80.980.8-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
68.378.2
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
49.587.8
Aider
Real-world code editing
55.141.8
AIME
Competition math
50.0--
GPT-OSS-120b significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
GPT-OSS-120b
131,072
tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-OSS-120bWinner
Tokens/second246.2 tok/s301.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s0.51s
GPT-OSS-120b responds 22% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-OSS-120b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-OSS-120b
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedJun 2025Aug 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Modalities

Input
fileimagetextaudiovideo
Output
text

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash with:

Compare GPT-OSS-120b with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.19/M tokens.
GPT-OSS-120b scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.6, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash's score of 17.8.
Gemini 2.5 Flash has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports vision. GPT-OSS-120b does not support vision.