Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 300 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.25$1.50 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$2.00 GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.13N/A Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cache Write (per 1M)$0.38N/A Gemini 2.5 Pro
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct is 53% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Providers

Google AI Studio $1.00 (Cheapest)
Google $1.25
Vercel $2.50

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct Providers

OpenAI $1.50 (Cheapest)
Vercel $1.50 (Cheapest)
Azure $1.50 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Pro Wins
0
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
34.6--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
31.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
87.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.2--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
84.4--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
80.1--
AIME
Competition math
88.7--
Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Pro
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
4,095
tokens
Max output: 4,096 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 100% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo InstructWinner
Tokens/second126.6 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token25.27sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleOpenAI
ReleasedJun 2025Sep 2023

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro with:

Compare GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.25/M tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window, while GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct has a 4,095 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision. GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct does not support vision.
Advertise with us