Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Sao10k

Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3 8B Lunaris

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 300 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 27B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 3 8B Lunaris wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3 27B
Context Window
Gemma 3 27B
Speed
Gemma 3 27B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 3 27BLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.04Tie
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.05 Llama 3 8B Lunaris
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.02N/A Gemma 3 27B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3 8B Lunaris is 37% cheaper overall.

Gemma 3 27B Providers

Chutes $0.04 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.08
DeepInfra $0.08
NCompass $0.09
Nebius $0.10

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Providers

DeepInfra $0.04 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.05

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemma 3 27B Wins
1
Llama 3 8B Lunaris Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
10.325.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
9.6--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
20.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
66.931.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
42.86.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
13.7--
Aider
Real-world code editing
4.9--
AIME
Competition math
25.3--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-32.1-
Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 3 27B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 3 27B
128,000
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Llama 3 8B Lunaris
8,192
tokens
Gemma 3 27B has a 94% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 3 27BLlama 3 8B LunarisWinner
Tokens/second34.6 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.22sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 27BLlama 3 8B Lunaris
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 27BLlama 3 8B Lunaris
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleSao10k
ReleasedMar 2025Aug 2024

Gemma 3 27B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3 8B Lunaris Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 27B with:

Compare Llama 3 8B Lunaris with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Lunaris has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Gemma 3 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.6, compared to Llama 3 8B Lunaris's score of N/A.
Gemma 3 27B has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3 8B Lunaris has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemma 3 27B supports vision. Llama 3 8B Lunaris does not support vision.
Advertise with us