Key Takeaways
GPT-5.3 Codex wins:
- Larger context window
- Faster response time
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Better at coding
- Supports vision
Llama 2 7B wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 2 7B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | GPT-5.3 Codex | Llama 2 7B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $1.75 | $0.20 | Llama 2 7B |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $14.00 | $0.20 | Llama 2 7B |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | $0.17 | $0.10 | Llama 2 7B |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 2 7B is 96% cheaper overall.
GPT-5.3 Codex Providers
No provider data available
Llama 2 7B Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
3
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-5.3 Codex Wins
0
Llama 2 7B Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | GPT-5.3 Codex | Llama 2 7B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | 54.0 | - | - |
Coding Index Code generation & understanding | 53.1 | - | - |
GPQA Graduate-level science | 91.5 | - | - |
GPT-5.3 Codex significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
400,000
tokens
Llama 2 7B
N/A
tokens
Speed Performance
| Metric | GPT-5.3 Codex | Llama 2 7B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens/second | 68.3 tok/s | N/A | |
| Time to First Token | 81.66s | N/A |
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-5.3 Codex | Llama 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | GPT-5.3 Codex | Llama 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Author | OpenAI | Meta-llama |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Unknown |
GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities
Input
textimage
Output
text
Llama 2 7B Modalities
Input
Output