Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.75$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$14.00$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.17N/A GPT-5.3 Codex
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 96% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.3 Codex Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
3
GPT-5.3 Codex Wins
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
54.014.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
53.110.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-8.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-69.2-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
91.548.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-29.0-
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
GPT-5.3 Codex significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.3 Codex
400,000
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 67% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/second68.4 tok/s82.7 tok/s
Time to First Token87.36s0.24s
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 responds 21% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAINvidia
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2025

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.