Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Z-ai

GPT-5.3 Codex vs GLM-4.7-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

114 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM-4.7-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
GLM-4.7-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GLM-4.7-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.75$0.06 GLM-4.7-Flash
Output (per 1M tokens)$14.00$0.40 GLM-4.7-Flash
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.17$0.01 GLM-4.7-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GLM-4.7-Flash is 97% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.3 Codex Providers

No provider data available

GLM-4.7-Flash Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

3
Benchmarks Compared
3
GPT-5.3 Codex Wins
0
GLM-4.7-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
54.022.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
53.111.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
91.545.2
GPT-5.3 Codex significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.3 Codex
400,000
tokens
GLM-4.7-Flash
202,752
tokens
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 49% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-FlashWinner
Tokens/second63.8 tok/s87.8 tok/s
Time to First Token83.49s0.71s
GLM-4.7-Flash responds 38% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexGLM-4.7-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Jan 2026

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM-4.7-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Compare GLM-4.7-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. GLM-4.7-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's score of 11.0.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while GLM-4.7-Flash has a 202,752 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. GLM-4.7-Flash supports vision.