Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Gryphe
vs
Xiaomi

MythoMax 13B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

MythoMax 13B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
MythoMax 13B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMythoMax 13BMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMythoMax 13BMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGrypheXiaomi
ReleasedJul 2023Dec 2025

MythoMax 13B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare MythoMax 13B with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MythoMax 13B has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. MythoMax 13B has cheaper output pricing at $0.06/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to MythoMax 13B's score of N/A.
MythoMax 13B has a 4,096 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
MythoMax 13B does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.