Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Ibm-granite
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Granite 4.0 Micro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Granite 4.0 Micro
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context Window
Granite 4.0 Micro
Speed
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGranite 4.0 MicroLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.02 Granite 4.0 Micro
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.11$0.05 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 32% cheaper overall.

Granite 4.0 Micro Providers

Cloudflare $0.02 (Cheapest)

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Providers

Nebius $0.02 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.02 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.02 (Cheapest)
Groq $0.05
SiliconFlow $0.06

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Granite 4.0 Micro Wins
0
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-11.7-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-4.9-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-4.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-47.6-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-25.9-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-11.6-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-37.6-
AIME
Competition math
-7.7-
Both models show comparable benchmark performance.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Granite 4.0 Micro
131,000
tokens
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
16,384
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Granite 4.0 Micro has a 87% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGranite 4.0 MicroLlama 3.1 8B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A162.2 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.33s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGranite 4.0 MicroLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGranite 4.0 MicroLlama 3.1 8B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorIbm-graniteMeta-llama
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2024

Granite 4.0 Micro Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Granite 4.0 Micro with:

Compare Llama 3.1 8B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Granite 4.0 Micro has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 4.9, compared to Granite 4.0 Micro's score of N/A.
Granite 4.0 Micro has a 131,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a 16,384 token context window.
Granite 4.0 Micro does not support vision. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct does not support vision.