Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Ibm-granite
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Granite 4.0 Micro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Granite 4.0 Micro
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context Window
Granite 4.0 Micro
Speed
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGranite 4.0 MicroLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGranite 4.0 MicroLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorIbm-graniteMeta-llama
ReleasedOct 2025Sep 2024

Granite 4.0 Micro Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Granite 4.0 Micro has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.05/M tokens.
Granite 4.0 Micro has a 131,000 token context window, while Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has a 80,000 token context window.
Granite 4.0 Micro supports vision. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct does not support vision.