Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Ibm-granite
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Granite 4.0 Micro vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Granite 4.0 Micro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Granite 4.0 Micro
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGranite 4.0 MicroMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGranite 4.0 MicroMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorIbm-graniteMinimax
ReleasedOct 2025Mar 2026

Granite 4.0 Micro Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Granite 4.0 Micro with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Granite 4.0 Micro has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Granite 4.0 Micro has cheaper output pricing at $0.11/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Granite 4.0 Micro's score of N/A.
Granite 4.0 Micro has a 131,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Granite 4.0 Micro supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.