Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Inception
Inception
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Mercury 2 vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mercury 2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mercury 2
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
Mercury 2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMercury 2GPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMercury 2GPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorInceptionOpenAI
ReleasedMar 2026Jan 2026

Mercury 2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mercury 2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Mercury 2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Mercury 2's score of 30.6.
Mercury 2 has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Mercury 2 does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.