Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Inception
Inception
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Mercury Coder vs GPT-5 Mini

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mercury Coder wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5 Mini wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mercury Coder
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Mini
Context Window
GPT-5 Mini
Speed
GPT-5 Mini

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMercury CoderGPT-5 Mini
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMercury CoderGPT-5 Mini
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorInceptionOpenAI
ReleasedApr 2025Aug 2025

Mercury Coder Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5 Mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mercury Coder with:

Compare GPT-5 Mini with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mercury Coder has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Mercury Coder has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
GPT-5 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.3, compared to Mercury Coder's score of N/A.
Mercury Coder has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5 Mini has a 400,000 token context window.
Mercury Coder does not support vision. GPT-5 Mini supports vision.