Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Inception
Inception
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Mercury vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mercury wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Mercury
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMercuryMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMercuryMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorInceptionMinimax
ReleasedJun 2025Mar 2026

Mercury Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mercury with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mercury has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Mercury has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Mercury's score of N/A.
Mercury has a 128,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Mercury does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.