Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Inception
Inception
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Mercury vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mercury wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mercury
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMercuryGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMercuryGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorInceptionOpenAI
ReleasedJun 2025Jan 2026

Mercury Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mercury has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Mercury has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
Mercury has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Mercury does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.