Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Liquid
Liquid
vs
Minimax
Minimax

LFM2-24B-A2B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Key Takeaways

LFM2-24B-A2B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
LFM2-24B-A2B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLFM2-24B-A2BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLFM2-24B-A2BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorLiquidMinimax
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

LFM2-24B-A2B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare LFM2-24B-A2B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

LFM2-24B-A2B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. LFM2-24B-A2B has cheaper output pricing at $0.12/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to LFM2-24B-A2B's score of N/A.
LFM2-24B-A2B has a 32,768 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
LFM2-24B-A2B does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.