Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Liquid
Liquid
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

LFM2-24B-A2B vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

115 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

New

Stop Googling APIs — let your agent choose

Our upcoming API Finder MCP server helps AI agents discover and compare APIs for any task.

Learn More →

Key Takeaways

LFM2-24B-A2B wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLFM2-24B-A2BMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLFM2-24B-A2BMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorLiquidMistral AI
ReleasedFeb 2026Jul 2024

LFM2-24B-A2B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare LFM2-24B-A2B with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
LFM2-24B-A2B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
LFM2-24B-A2B has a 32,768 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
LFM2-24B-A2B does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.