Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Liquid
Liquid
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLiquidAI/LFM2-2.6BLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLiquidAI/LFM2-2.6BLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorLiquidMeta-llama
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2024

LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B has cheaper input pricing at $0.01/M tokens. LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B has cheaper output pricing at $0.02/M tokens.
LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B has a 32,768 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
LiquidAI/LFM2-2.6B does not support vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.