Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mancer
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Weaver (alpha) vs Kimi K2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Weaver (alpha) wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Weaver (alpha)
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Context Window
Kimi K2.5
Speed
Kimi K2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWeaver (alpha)Kimi K2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWeaver (alpha)Kimi K2.5
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMancerMoonshotai
ReleasedAug 2023Jan 2026

Weaver (alpha) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.38/M tokens. Weaver (alpha) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
Weaver (alpha) has a 8,000 token context window, while Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window.
Weaver (alpha) does not support vision. Kimi K2.5 supports vision.