Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mancer
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Weaver (alpha) vs GPT-5.1-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Weaver (alpha) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Weaver (alpha)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWeaver (alpha)GPT-5.1-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWeaver (alpha)GPT-5.1-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMancerOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2023Nov 2025

Weaver (alpha) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.1-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Weaver (alpha) has cheaper input pricing at $0.75/M tokens. Weaver (alpha) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
Weaver (alpha) has a 8,000 token context window, while GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Weaver (alpha) does not support vision. GPT-5.1-Codex supports vision.