Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
MA
Mancer
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Weaver (alpha) vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute— We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Weaver (alpha) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Weaver (alpha)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureWeaver (alpha)GPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyWeaver (alpha)GPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMancerOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2023Feb 2026

Weaver (alpha) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Weaver (alpha) with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Weaver (alpha) has cheaper input pricing at $0.75/M tokens. Weaver (alpha) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Weaver (alpha)'s score of N/A.
Weaver (alpha) has a 8,000 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Weaver (alpha) does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.