Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Code Llama 13B Python vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Code Llama 13B Python wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Code Llama 13B Python
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCode Llama 13B PythonLlama 3.1 405B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.90 Code Llama 13B Python
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.90 Code Llama 13B Python
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.10$0.45 Code Llama 13B Python
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Code Llama 13B Python is 78% cheaper overall.

Code Llama 13B Python Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Code Llama 13B Python Wins
0
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCode Llama 13B PythonLlama 3.1 405B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-17.4-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-14.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-3.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-73.2-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-51.5-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-30.5-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-66.2-
AIME
Competition math
-21.3-
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Code Llama 13B Python
N/A
tokens
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
131,000
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricCode Llama 13B PythonLlama 3.1 405B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A30.4 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.68s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCode Llama 13B PythonLlama 3.1 405B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCode Llama 13B PythonLlama 3.1 405B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedUnknownJul 2024

Code Llama 13B Python Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Code Llama 13B Python with:

Compare Llama 3.1 405B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Code Llama 13B Python has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Code Llama 13B Python has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 14.5, compared to Code Llama 13B Python's score of N/A.
Code Llama 13B Python has a unknown token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window.
Code Llama 13B Python does not support vision. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision.
Advertise with us