Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Code Llama 13B Python vs Llama 4 Maverick

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Code Llama 13B Python wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Code Llama 13B Python
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCode Llama 13B PythonLlama 4 Maverick
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCode Llama 13B PythonLlama 4 Maverick
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedUnknownApr 2025

Code Llama 13B Python Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Code Llama 13B Python has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Code Llama 13B Python has a 16,384 token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Code Llama 13B Python does not support vision. Llama 4 Maverick supports vision.