Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Code Llama 13B Python vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

107 out of our 480 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Code Llama 13B Python wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Code Llama 13B Python
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCode Llama 13B PythonMiniMax M2.1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.27 Code Llama 13B Python
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.95 Code Llama 13B Python
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.10$0.03 MiniMax M2.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Code Llama 13B Python is 55% cheaper overall.

Code Llama 13B Python Providers

No provider data available

MiniMax M2.1 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Code Llama 13B Python Wins
0
MiniMax M2.1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCode Llama 13B PythonMiniMax M2.1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-39.4-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-32.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-82.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-87.5-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-83.0-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-81.0-
MiniMax M2.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Code Llama 13B Python
N/A
tokens
MiniMax M2.1
196,608
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricCode Llama 13B PythonMiniMax M2.1Winner
Tokens/secondN/A41.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A2.07s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCode Llama 13B PythonMiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCode Llama 13B PythonMiniMax M2.1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedUnknownDec 2025

Code Llama 13B Python Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Code Llama 13B Python with:

Compare MiniMax M2.1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Code Llama 13B Python has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Code Llama 13B Python has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Code Llama 13B Python's score of N/A.
Code Llama 13B Python has a unknown token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Code Llama 13B Python does not support vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.
Advertise with us