Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Code Llama 13B Python vs GPT-5 Mini

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Code Llama 13B Python wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5 Mini wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Code Llama 13B Python
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Mini
Context Window
GPT-5 Mini
Speed
GPT-5 Mini

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCode Llama 13B PythonGPT-5 Mini
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCode Llama 13B PythonGPT-5 Mini
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownAug 2025

Code Llama 13B Python Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5 Mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Code Llama 13B Python has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Code Llama 13B Python has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Code Llama 13B Python has a 16,384 token context window, while GPT-5 Mini has a 400,000 token context window.
Code Llama 13B Python does not support vision. GPT-5 Mini supports vision.