Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Code Llama 70B Python vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Code Llama 70B Python wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Code Llama 70B Python
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCode Llama 70B PythonGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCode Llama 70B PythonGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Code Llama 70B Python Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Code Llama 70B Python has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Code Llama 70B Python has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Code Llama 70B Python has a 4,096 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Code Llama 70B Python does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.