Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Llama 2 13B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 2 13B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Llama 2 13B
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 2 13BLlama 3.1 405B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 2 13BLlama 3.1 405B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMeta-llama
ReleasedUnknownJul 2024

Llama 2 13B Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 2 13B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Llama 2 13B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Llama 2 13B has a 4,096 token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has a 131,000 token context window.
Llama 2 13B does not support vision. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not support vision.