Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Llama 3 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.1
Context Window
MiniMax M2.1
Speed
MiniMax M2.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.1
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMinimax
ReleasedApr 2024Dec 2025

Llama 3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. Llama 3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.74/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 32.8, compared to Llama 3 70B Instruct's score of 6.8.
Llama 3 70B Instruct has a 8,192 token context window, while MiniMax M2.1 has a 196,608 token context window.
Llama 3 70B Instruct does not support vision. MiniMax M2.1 does not support vision.