Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3 70B Instruct vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Llama 3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMeta-llamaXiaomi
ReleasedApr 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.74/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Llama 3 70B Instruct's score of 6.8.
Llama 3 70B Instruct has a 8,192 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3 70B Instruct does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.