Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3 70B Instruct vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GLM 5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
GLM 5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3 70B InstructGLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3 70B InstructGLM 5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaZ-ai
ReleasedApr 2024Feb 2026

Llama 3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.51/M tokens. Llama 3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.74/M tokens.
GLM 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 39.0, compared to Llama 3 70B Instruct's score of 6.8.
Llama 3 70B Instruct has a 8,192 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
Llama 3 70B Instruct does not support vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.