Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Meta-llama
Meta-llama
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Llama 3 8B Instruct vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3 8B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3 8B Instruct
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Llama 3 8B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3 8B InstructMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3 8B InstructMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMeta-llamaMistral AI
ReleasedApr 2024Jul 2024

Llama 3 8B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Llama 3 8B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Llama 3 8B Instruct has a 8,192 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Llama 3 8B Instruct does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.